麻花传媒

Advisor Ordered to Pay $17.7 Million Over unsuitable REIT Sales

Posted on March 18th, 2025 at 3:33 PM
Advisor Ordered to Pay $17.7 Million Over unsuitable REIT Sales

From the desk of Jim Eccleston at 麻花传媒

A FINRA arbitration panel has ordered former advisor Mark Sam Kolta to pay nearly $17.7 million in damages, plus interest and costs, to his former firm, National Securities, following allegations of breach of contract and unjust enrichment. According to Financial Planning, the award stems from Kolta’s alleged involvement in placing clients in unsuitable private real estate investment trusts (nontraded REITs) while at National Securities.

Kolta, who has faced 28 customer complaints since 2018, allegedly steered 16 clients into alternative investment vehicles, moving $4.8 million into nontraded REITs. FINRA accused him of earning $290,000 in commissions while his clients suffered substantial losses. The regulator also found that Kolta failed to consider clients' financial situations, investment objectives, and risk tolerance. In some cases, he allegedly falsified documents to make investors appear more qualified for high-risk investments than they actually were.

In August 2023, a FINRA disciplinary panel barred Kolta from the securities industry and ordered him to disgorge $297,823 in ill-gotten gains, along with paying $6,041.61 in hearing costs. He has since appealed the decision to FINRA’s National Adjudicatory Council.

B. Riley Financial, which acquired National Securities in installments between 2018 and 2021, paid most of the investor settlements resulting from Kolta’s actions. As reported by Financial Planning, CEO Michael Mullen stated that B. Riley supported the settlements to ensure harmed investors were compensated.

Kolta filed a counterclaim against National Securities seeking damages and attorneys’ fees. However, he did not attend the evidentiary hearing before the FINRA panel, leading to the dismissal of his claim.

Securities expert Douglas Schulz questioned how Kolta was able to remain in the industry for so long despite his extensive disciplinary record. Schulz emphasized the need for stricter oversight of high-risk advisors, stating, “If you are going to hire them, you have to supervise them. And if they continue to do questionable things, you need to get rid of them.”

 

麻花传媒 LLC represents investors and financial advisors nationwide in securities, employment, transition, regulatory, and disciplinary matters.

Tags: eccleston, eccleston law

Return to Archive

TESTIMONIALS

Previous
Next

Thank You from the bottom of our hearts for all you have done for us. When we realized this was a very bad investment - we did not know where to turn for help. Then we received your name. When we called you - you were so kind to us and then agreed to help us. For this we are so very grateful. The world would be a much nicer place if there were more people like the two of you in it. We will always remember all the help and kindness you have shown us. Thank you so very very much for everything.

Wayne and Judy S.

LATEST NEWS AND ARTICLES

November 4, 2025
FINRA Suspends Former Morgan Stanley Advisor Over $180,000 in Improper Transfers

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) suspended former Morgan Stanley advisor C.J. Kline for two years and imposed a $5,000 fine for allegedly executing more than $180,000 in improper fund transfers between his personal and brokerage accounts.

November 3, 2025
Former Florida Broker Pleads Guilty in $2.7 Million Investment Fraud and PPP Loan Scheme

Former Florida broker Jared Dean Eakes, 34, of Jacksonville, has pleaded guilty to wire and bank fraud in connection with a $2.7 million investment scam and a separate scheme involving over $4.75 million in fraudulent Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loans, according to U.S. Attorney Gregory W. Kehoe for the Middle District of Florida.

October 31, 2025
Department of Labor Sued Over Illegitimate Deferred Compensation Opinion Letter

Three former Morgan Stanley advisors filed suit this week against the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL), claiming the agency exceeded its authority and was unduly influenced when it issued an advisory opinion that sought to undermine their deferred compensation claims.