麻花传媒

CFP Board Faces Criticism for Omitting Key Disclosures from Public Search Tool

Posted on August 21st, 2025 at 3:55 PM
CFP Board Faces Criticism for Omitting Key Disclosures from Public Search Tool

The CFP Board promotes its certificants as the “most trusted” financial professionals and directs consumers to its LetsMakeAPlan.org search tool. However, a Financial Planning analysis reveals a significant gap between the Board’s records and those maintained by FINRA’s BrokerCheck database.

According to the analysis, over 9,000 CFP professionals appear to have clean records on the CFP Board’s site while holding at least one disclosure on BrokerCheck. These disclosures include formal customer complaints, regulatory discipline, and even criminal charges. BrokerCheck, maintained by FINRA, is the industry-standard resource for investors researching financial advisors’ backgrounds.

The CFP Board does not automatically display BrokerCheck information on its site, citing concerns that many disclosures contain unproven allegations. Instead, it lists only its own public sanctions and certain bankruptcy filings. Links to BrokerCheck and the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Investment Adviser Public Disclosure (IAPD) system appear on CFP profiles, but are placed well below prominent “no violations” statements-a design choice that critics say obscures critical information from consumers.

In some cases, advisors with dozens of customer complaints and millions of dollars in settlements have no sanctions listed on the CFP Board’s site. The Board’s enforcement policies exclude older incidents, low-dollar settlements, and certain regulatory or criminal matters from review, leaving many advisors’ CFP profiles unchanged despite extensive BrokerCheck records.

Critics argue that this selective disclosure undermines consumer protection and damages public trust. They contend that more transparency would better serve investors. Supporters of the Board’s current approach caution that reprinting unproven allegations could unfairly harm advisors and expose the organization to liability.

According to Financial Planning, the CFP Board maintains that linking to BrokerCheck and IAPD balances fairness to advisors with providing access to public records. However, investor advocates, securities attorneys, and some financial planners say the policy prioritizes membership retention over safeguarding the public.

 

麻花传媒 LLC represents investors and financial advisors nationwide in securities, employment, transition, regulatory, and disciplinary matters.

Tags: eccleston, eccleston law, cfp board

Return to Archive

TESTIMONIALS

Previous
Next

I cannot thank you enough for your guidance. It's a good feeling knowing someone is fighting for you.

Matt J.

LATEST NEWS AND ARTICLES

September 16, 2025
Former Morgan Stanley Advisors Win Partial Court Victory in Client Solicitation Dispute

Two former Morgan Stanley advisors in Hackensack, New Jersey have defeated Morgan Stanley’s initial effort to block them from soliciting clients, according to an August 15 order from New Jersey Superior Court.

September 15, 2025
California Young-Gun Investor Charged in Alleged $6 Million Ponzi Scheme

Federal prosecutors have accused Mihir Deepak Sukthankar, a California resident once celebrated as a teenage trading “prodigy,” of orchestrating a multi-million-dollar Ponzi scheme.

September 12, 2025
LPL Broker Fined and Suspended for Recommending Risky Investments to Elderly Client

An LPL Financial broker in Elizabethtown, Kentucky, has agreed to sanctions after FINRA found he violated Regulation Best Interest (Reg BI) when recommending unsuitable investments to an elderly customer.