麻花传媒

FINRA Proposes Accelerated Arbitration for Ill Parties and Elderly

Posted on April 22nd, 2025 at 12:07 PM
FINRA Proposes Accelerated Arbitration for Ill Parties and Elderly

From the desk of Jim Eccleston at 麻花传媒

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) has submitted a proposed rule change to the SEC aimed at speeding up arbitration proceedings for parties who are elderly or suffering from serious health conditions. According to SEC.gov, the proposal would introduce new FINRA Rules 12808 and 13808—collectively known as “Accelerated Processing”—to the Codes of Arbitration Procedure for both customer and industry disputes.

Currently, FINRA's Dispute Resolution Services (DRS) offers an expedited program, but it only accelerates internal administrative steps like arbitrator selection and initial scheduling. This limited approach results in only marginal time savings. Under the proposed rule, FINRA seeks to implement rule-based deadlines and explicit directives for arbitrators, cutting resolution time by approximately six months.

To request accelerated processing, a party must either:

  • Be at least 70 years old, or
  • Certify that they have a serious medical condition requiring expedited resolution
    to avoid prejudicing their interests in the arbitration.

Importantly, parties making medical claims need not disclose specific medical details, and such certification cannot be used to compel additional information or questioning at hearings. SEC.gov reports that the proposal allows other parties to request scheduling accommodations based on age or health, even if they do not meet the formal eligibility criteria.

The Director of DRS would assess whether the request meets the criteria. This determination would be objective, verifying age or proper certification and without evaluating the reasonableness of the party’s belief that expedited processing is necessary.

If approved, the proposal would accelerate proceedings in three primary ways:

  • Faster Arbitrator Selection: The Director must send arbitrator lists to parties “as soon as practicable” after the last answer is due, regardless of any agreed-upon extensions.
  • Case Resolution Timeline: Panels would be directed to aim for final awards within 10 months from the date the Director confirms eligibility for accelerated processing. A prehearing conference would be required to set deadlines and hearing dates consistent with this target, though the 10-month goal would remain a guideline rather than a mandate.
  • Shortened Default Deadlines: The proposal would compress several key deadlines:

-Serving Answers: From 45 days to 30.
-Responding to Third-Party Claims: From 45 days to 30.
-Returning Arbitrator Lists: From 20 days to 10.
-Customer Case Discovery Responses: From 60 days to 35.
- Other Discovery Requests: From 60 days to 30.

FINRA believes these deadlines are manageable and would not compromise fairness. Panels and parties would retain flexibility to extend deadlines where justified, using existing Code provisions.

On March 26, 2025, the SEC initiated proceedings under Section 19(b)(2)(B) of the Exchange Act to further analyze whether the proposal aligns with the Act and to allow for additional public input. This procedural step signals no conclusion but opens the door for deeper review of the legal and policy implications.

 

麻花传媒 LLC represents investors and financial advisors nationwide in securities, employment, transition, regulatory, and disciplinary matters.

Tags: eccleston, eccleston law, finra

Return to Archive

TESTIMONIALS

Previous
Next

 


It was really fun seeing you fight for us. You have an amazing way of thinking out of the box.


 

Beth M.

LATEST NEWS AND ARTICLES

July 2, 2025
SEC Panel Calls for Tighter Limits on RIAs' Mandatory Arbitration Clauses

AdvisorHub reports that the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Investor Advisory Committee has finalized a recommendation urging the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) to rein in the use of mandatory arbitration clauses by registered investment advisers (“RIA”s).

July 1, 2025
State Regulators Fine Five Major Broker-Dealers Nearly $10 Million for Excessive Commission Charges

A coalition of state securities regulators has ordered five broker-dealers — including Edward Jones, LPL Financial, RBC, Stifel, and TD Ameritrade — to pay almost $9.9 million in penalties for overcharging customers on small-value trades.

June 30, 2025
SEC Charges New Mexico Investment Advisor with Fee Fraud and Fiduciary Breaches

The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) has charged David A. Nagler and his firm, New Line Capital LLC, with defrauding clients through deceptive fee disclosures and undisclosed conflicts of interest.