麻花传媒

Understanding Alternative Investments and Risk Management

Posted on December 23rd, 2024 at 3:13 PM
Understanding Alternative Investments and Risk Management

From the desk of Jim Eccleston at 麻花传媒

Alternative investments once again are gaining traction, according to a recent article in InvestmentNews. To explain why, the publication interviewed Kirk Chisholm, a wealth manager and principal at Innovative Advisory Group. He sees the rise of alternative investments as a response to periods of market instability. According to Chisholm, when traditional markets like Wall Street lose investor confidence, alternative investments gain traction. InvestmentNews reports that this pattern has played out repeatedly, with different asset classes gaining popularity during economic uncertainty only to recede as markets stabilize.

Chisholm identifies the early 2000s as a pivotal moment when hedge funds surged in popularity. Investors were drawn to the hedging aspect, particularly during market downturns, only to lose interest as markets rallied. This cyclical trend continued with other alternative assets like managed futures, which similarly gained attention before becoming "watered down" by mainstream interest.

Chisholm sees private equity and private credit as the leading trends in alternative investments. However, he stresses a clear distinction between Wall Street’s alternatives and those found on the private side, which include real estate and private mortgages. Chisholm told InvestmentNews that these private investments tend to exhibit more stability, with investors remaining consistent in their focus despite market trends.

Chisholm’s perspective on risk is another key area of interest. He emphasizes that many investors conflate risk with volatility. Volatility, he explains, refers to short-term price fluctuations, while risk is the potential for a permanent loss of capital. According to Chisholm, true risk management involves identifying all potential risks, mitigating as many as possible, and accepting what remains.

 

麻花传媒 LLC represents investors and financial advisors nationwide in securities, employment, transition, regulatory, and disciplinary matters.

Tags: eccleston, eccleston law

Return to Archive

TESTIMONIALS

Previous
Next

Jim, Stephany and the whole team were a God send.  We felt like we were put into a situation where we had no advocate. Jim’s team came in with a strong, well laid out strategy on how to get our story heard. Where our outside compliance company had no ability to help, our Broker Dealer was impenitent, and the regulators were aggressive pursuing vague rules, Jim came like a barricade against an assault we did not understand. Though you pay member dues to be affiliated with FINRA and a B/D, you have no voice. The only thing that is truly heard in this un-level playing field is a bulldog’s bark like Jim’s. I would encourage anyone to call Jim and his team to find a real ally in the tough and complicated world of securities regulation. They are truly the best.

Greg P.

LATEST NEWS AND ARTICLES

November 4, 2025
FINRA Suspends Former Morgan Stanley Advisor Over $180,000 in Improper Transfers

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) suspended former Morgan Stanley advisor C.J. Kline for two years and imposed a $5,000 fine for allegedly executing more than $180,000 in improper fund transfers between his personal and brokerage accounts.

November 3, 2025
Former Florida Broker Pleads Guilty in $2.7 Million Investment Fraud and PPP Loan Scheme

Former Florida broker Jared Dean Eakes, 34, of Jacksonville, has pleaded guilty to wire and bank fraud in connection with a $2.7 million investment scam and a separate scheme involving over $4.75 million in fraudulent Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loans, according to U.S. Attorney Gregory W. Kehoe for the Middle District of Florida.

October 31, 2025
Department of Labor Sued Over Illegitimate Deferred Compensation Opinion Letter

Three former Morgan Stanley advisors filed suit this week against the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL), claiming the agency exceeded its authority and was unduly influenced when it issued an advisory opinion that sought to undermine their deferred compensation claims.